<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LXC &#8211; Linux Containers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.bodhizazen.net/linux/lxc-linux-containers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.bodhizazen.net/linux/lxc-linux-containers/</link>
	<description>A LAMP in the Samsara</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 07:48:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: NIMDAE - Virtualizing With lxc In Ubuntu &#8211; Done Right!</title>
		<link>http://blog.bodhizazen.net/linux/lxc-linux-containers/comment-page-1/#comment-2120</link>
		<dc:creator>NIMDAE - Virtualizing With lxc In Ubuntu &#8211; Done Right!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 05:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bodhizazen.net/?p=871#comment-2120</guid>
		<description>[...] http://blog.bodhizazen.net/linux/lxc-linux-containers/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://blog.bodhizazen.net/linux/lxc-linux-containers/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.bodhizazen.net/linux/lxc-linux-containers/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LXC: Linux container tools</title>
		<link>http://blog.bodhizazen.net/linux/lxc-linux-containers/comment-page-1/#comment-1937</link>
		<dc:creator>LXC: Linux container tools</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 18:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bodhizazen.net/?p=871#comment-1937</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shadows of epiphany &#187; Blog Archive &#187; LXC Configure Fedora Containers</title>
		<link>http://blog.bodhizazen.net/linux/lxc-linux-containers/comment-page-1/#comment-1873</link>
		<dc:creator>Shadows of epiphany &#187; Blog Archive &#187; LXC Configure Fedora Containers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 16:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bodhizazen.net/?p=871#comment-1873</guid>
		<description>[...] post assumes you have configured your host, see my previous post if you need assistance configuring your host [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post assumes you have configured your host, see my previous post if you need assistance configuring your host [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shadows of epiphany &#187; Blog Archive &#187; LXC Configure Debian Containers</title>
		<link>http://blog.bodhizazen.net/linux/lxc-linux-containers/comment-page-1/#comment-1872</link>
		<dc:creator>Shadows of epiphany &#187; Blog Archive &#187; LXC Configure Debian Containers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 15:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bodhizazen.net/?p=871#comment-1872</guid>
		<description>[...] post assumes you have configured your host, see my previous post if you need assistance configuring your host [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post assumes you have configured your host, see my previous post if you need assistance configuring your host [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shadows of epiphany &#187; Blog Archive &#187; LXC Configure Ubuntu Lucid Containers</title>
		<link>http://blog.bodhizazen.net/linux/lxc-linux-containers/comment-page-1/#comment-1865</link>
		<dc:creator>Shadows of epiphany &#187; Blog Archive &#187; LXC Configure Ubuntu Lucid Containers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 06:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bodhizazen.net/?p=871#comment-1865</guid>
		<description>[...] post assumes you have configured your host, see my previous post if you need assistance configuring your host [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post assumes you have configured your host, see my previous post if you need assistance configuring your host [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bodhi.zazen</title>
		<link>http://blog.bodhizazen.net/linux/lxc-linux-containers/comment-page-1/#comment-1561</link>
		<dc:creator>bodhi.zazen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bodhizazen.net/?p=871#comment-1561</guid>
		<description>Eirck : These tools are all very similar, although they vary somewhat in features. 

Here is a nice comparison:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operating_system-level_virtualization

LXC is NOT as developed as BSD jails and Linux has the disadvantage in that, among other things there is a great deal of variability across distros and the various boot scripts where BSD is more uniform.

LXC is, IMO, in early development and, again, IMHO, not yet ready for a production server (personally I have concerns about the ease of breaking out of the container, and again, IMO, the LXC containers are not as isolated from the main OS / kernel processes as I would like).

For now, I will stay with openvz.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eirck : These tools are all very similar, although they vary somewhat in features. </p>
<p>Here is a nice comparison:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operating_system-level_virtualization" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operating_system-level_virtualization</a></p>
<p>LXC is NOT as developed as BSD jails and Linux has the disadvantage in that, among other things there is a great deal of variability across distros and the various boot scripts where BSD is more uniform.</p>
<p>LXC is, IMO, in early development and, again, IMHO, not yet ready for a production server (personally I have concerns about the ease of breaking out of the container, and again, IMO, the LXC containers are not as isolated from the main OS / kernel processes as I would like).</p>
<p>For now, I will stay with openvz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bodhi.zazen</title>
		<link>http://blog.bodhizazen.net/linux/lxc-linux-containers/comment-page-1/#comment-1560</link>
		<dc:creator>bodhi.zazen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bodhizazen.net/?p=871#comment-1560</guid>
		<description>Ricky: That is correct. Guests or containers are Linux only.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ricky: That is correct. Guests or containers are Linux only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricky</title>
		<link>http://blog.bodhizazen.net/linux/lxc-linux-containers/comment-page-1/#comment-1558</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bodhizazen.net/?p=871#comment-1558</guid>
		<description>Wow!It&#039;s excellent.Linux containers run Linux processes on a Linux kernel. This means you can run Linux but not other operating systems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!It&#8217;s excellent.Linux containers run Linux processes on a Linux kernel. This means you can run Linux but not other operating systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Lee Green</title>
		<link>http://blog.bodhizazen.net/linux/lxc-linux-containers/comment-page-1/#comment-1541</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Lee Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 22:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bodhizazen.net/?p=871#comment-1541</guid>
		<description>From the description, this sounds somewhat similar to FreeBSD jails, which similarly are a &quot;hack&quot; on top of chroot. Have you ever encountered FreeBSD jails, and if so, would you care to compare/contrast FreeBSD jails, OpenVZ, and LXC? I think that would be interesting information for anybody interested in lightweight containerization.

-ELG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the description, this sounds somewhat similar to FreeBSD jails, which similarly are a &#8220;hack&#8221; on top of chroot. Have you ever encountered FreeBSD jails, and if so, would you care to compare/contrast FreeBSD jails, OpenVZ, and LXC? I think that would be interesting information for anybody interested in lightweight containerization.</p>
<p>-ELG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Clarke</title>
		<link>http://blog.bodhizazen.net/linux/lxc-linux-containers/comment-page-1/#comment-1502</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bodhizazen.net/?p=871#comment-1502</guid>
		<description>This looks excellent - I cannot believe the community is not making more noise over this technology, perhaps they are to busy coo&#039;ing over Xen ??

If this matures to a technology similiar to Solaris Zones it could be a major win for the Linux community. I have been looking at this space for a while, openvz was never in the main branch and from memory there were another 2 offerings that were also available.

This is a great visualisation technology that has completly shaped the Solaris deployment and production landscape - I have seen it use end to end from development to test to production deployment as a natural task - create a zone, deploy app/db etc.

Don&#039;t get me wrong, Xen is good and has it&#039;s place, but for Linux on Linux hosting - containers just makes more sense. I am an avid OpenSolaris/Linux user and this is one of the major advantages OpenSolaris has in this area - they are so easy and versatile to use - I can knock up a new zone or clone an existing zone (with ZFS) in seconds and VERY, VERY easily (interesting as Solaris is normally harder to configure than Linux).

I&#039;m sure as it matures, as better/easier tools become available and we some integration when BTRFS  it will be a great technology - I&#039;ll certainly be having a look in Ubuntu 9.10 an look forward to the improvements in 10.04.

Keep up the excellent work!
Sean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks excellent &#8211; I cannot believe the community is not making more noise over this technology, perhaps they are to busy coo&#8217;ing over Xen ??</p>
<p>If this matures to a technology similiar to Solaris Zones it could be a major win for the Linux community. I have been looking at this space for a while, openvz was never in the main branch and from memory there were another 2 offerings that were also available.</p>
<p>This is a great visualisation technology that has completly shaped the Solaris deployment and production landscape &#8211; I have seen it use end to end from development to test to production deployment as a natural task &#8211; create a zone, deploy app/db etc.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, Xen is good and has it&#8217;s place, but for Linux on Linux hosting &#8211; containers just makes more sense. I am an avid OpenSolaris/Linux user and this is one of the major advantages OpenSolaris has in this area &#8211; they are so easy and versatile to use &#8211; I can knock up a new zone or clone an existing zone (with ZFS) in seconds and VERY, VERY easily (interesting as Solaris is normally harder to configure than Linux).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure as it matures, as better/easier tools become available and we some integration when BTRFS  it will be a great technology &#8211; I&#8217;ll certainly be having a look in Ubuntu 9.10 an look forward to the improvements in 10.04.</p>
<p>Keep up the excellent work!<br />
Sean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.080 seconds -->
